Dorcas Lane Turbine Decision delayed to November

We are pleased to tell you that the determination period in which AVDC were supposed to decide whether to approve or reject Force 9 Energy’s application to build 4 turbines on Dorcas Lane has been extended to 30th November 2012.

This now means that no decision will be made on 30th April, as we had previously believed to be the case.

So, what has changed?

On the 29th March AVDC wrote to the developer. They made a request for further information on bats to include a new survey to be carried out. In short they stated the survey, which identified a high level of bat activity including some extremely rare species, did not follow best practice nor the methodology laid out in the initial scoping document for the development signed off by the council in 2011. Neither were adequate mitigation measures proposed. They said no support could be given until a further survey had been carried out and that due to the breeding and migratory habits of the bats this must be carried out over the summer months. As such, this would therefore prevent AVDC determining the application by the 30th April.

AVDC also stated in their letter that, having reviewed the plans, they did not believe the correct application fee had been paid.  They had received £27,470 and the amount should have been £131,565. In normal circumstances they would ask for the application to be withdrawn and resubmitted. However in view of the considerable public involvement and consultation that has taken place already , they suggested the application be frozen until receipt together of the correct fee and the bat survey information at the end of the summer. This would mean that the 16 week determination period would start from receipt of the new fee, ensuring that the Council has time to make a determination and thereby removing the risk of the developer appealing for non determination. They finally requested that when responding Force 9 provide greater clarification within the resubmitted plans on the proposed access arrangements to the site.

On the 4th April Force 9 responded that they accepted the comments on the bats survey and that there was now agreement for the additional work to be carried out in the late summer. On this basis they were happy for the determination period to be extended until the 30th November 2012. (SDLT note that this assumes receipt of the planning fee by the 8th August). Force 9 also said they accepted AVDC’s request to deal with the fee issue at the same time resolution has been agreed with AVDC on both bats and access.

We see this latest development as very positive news – Force 9 Energy now face the challenge of adequately demonstrating that the erection of the turbines will not have a significant adverse effect on a number of extremely rare bats that inhabit the vicinity of the site. They also fully understand AVDC’s expectation that they pay a much higher fee, which is good news for us Council ratepayers.

At the same time, the delay co-incides with the growing tide of public and political discontent with the UK’s relentless pursuit of poorly sited wind farms. This mood will only strengthen and gain greater visibility over the coming months and put greater pressure on Councils to reject those applications that are inappropriately placed and/or most likely to be inefficient, of which Dorcas Lane is both. Indeed, Climate Change Minister Greg Barker has recently intimated at a potential change in Government policy away from onshore and more toward offshore, stating that the Coalition had inherited a policy that had been “unbalanced in favour of onshore wind” and that there had been “some installations in sensitive or unsuitable locations – too close to houses, or in an area of outstanding natural beauty”.

What does this delay mean for the SDLT action group? Very little in reality – we continue as normal in our endeavours to demonstrate the total unsuitability of the proposed location for the turbines. We will use the extra time to fine tune the development of our comprehensive rebuttal document to the Force 9 Energy application. This will address a range of issues including landscape impact, air safety, noise, health, cultural heritage, rights of way, residential amenity and site viability and will now be submitted to AVDC in line with the revised determination period.

At the same time, we will embark on a number of fund-raising activities – more detail of which will be communicated in due course.

Your ongoing support remains critical – remember there are many ways you can show this:

- via participation in our fund raising events or by making a much appreciated donation

- by making sure you have signed our petition and submitted your objection letter to AVDC.

- by offering to help local village teams who are coordinating our activities across all the villages.

- by offering your specialist services to the main SDLT Executive team (any PR experts out there? We would love to hear from you!).

If you wish to offer your services please feel free to contact us direct:

Malcolm Newing (Chairman) on 07702 067966

Joseph Cresswell (Vice Chairman) on 07941 338980

The Proposal at a Glance

What it is about?

A proposal to build 4 wind turbines each one over 410 feet high, or almost the height of the London Eye and 3 times that of the Milton Keynes Snow Dome.

Why should I be concerned?

The wind farm will be extremely close to the villages of  Hollingdon, Stoke Hammond, Soulbury, Stewkley, Drayton Parslow, Newton Longville, Newton Leys and Great Brickhill.  If you live in one of these villages you will be affected in some way.

If you live further away, don’t relax. It is proven that once one wind farm goes up in an area, many more follow. For example, since the first one was built in nearby Cambridgeshire in 2005, there have been 27 wind farms either erected, approved, under construction or currently in for planning application in the county, totalling 115 turbines!

How might it affect me?

• By reducing the price of your house, if you can sell it at all

• By damaging your health via sleep disturbance caused by noise and low-frequency vibration causing migraines and palpitations

• By causing stress and irritation from the shadow flicker caused by the sun passing behind the turning blades.

• By putting you and your family at risk of turbine blade fracture and ice thrown from the blades in winter.

• By spoiling your view of the countryside and taking away your rights to enjoy the amenities on your doorstep.

But won’t these turbines help save the planet?

The contribution to our renewable energy needs made by this wind farm will be tiny. This area has wind speeds lower than national average. There are other areas where the same wind farm would produce more energy, make a greater contribution and minimise the over-proliferation of wind turbines around the UK.

But why do it then?

Because the subsidies are so great that the true commercial viability of the project isn’t a matter for consideration. And because the developers have managed to tempt 3 local land owners with very lucrative rental premiums to let them put turbines on their land. It’s really that simple and that opportunistic!

What can I do about it?

• Read this website

• Become a supporter of the SDLT Action Group

• Make a donation to the high cost of fighting the proposal.

• Write a strong letter of objection.

What people are now saying...

Quote from Benny Peiser of the Global Warming Policy Foundation:

The public backlash against wind farms in not surprising. It is the inevitable and inexorable consequence of a costly, unpopular and completely pointless policy that is butchering Britain’s green and pleasant landscape without having any effect on the climate. The green projects are only viable because of the multi-million pound subsidies supporting a few hundred wealthy landowners and a handful of energy companies. By opposing wind farms, a growing number of neighbourhoods and communities are protecting both their local environments and their purses from blind exploitation

Daily Mail 11th July 2011

 

Quote from Barara Frey & Peter Haddin (University of Minnesota):

Although the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood, when wind turbines are built near homes, it is undenyable that their noise causes a constellation of unwelcome effects, with varying degrees, on health, sleep, and health quality of life

Report on Wind Turbines and Proximity to Homes December 2011

 

Quote from British physician Dr Christopher Hanning:

It is concluded that there is compelling evidence that wind turbine noise can and does disturb sleep and impair the health of those living too close and that current guidance is inadequate protection. It is [also] concluded that the occupants of properties sited within 1.5km of turbines will suffer unacceptable levels of sleep disturbance and potential risk to their health.

Report on Wind Turbine Noise, Sleep and Health April 2010

AGM

Under the constitution Stop Dorcas Lane Turbines group hereby give notice of the:-

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
MONDAY 21ST MAY 2012
COMMENCING AT 7.30pm
At
Stoke Hammond Community Centre, Bragenham Side, Stoke Hammond.


For more information click here

Time left.....

Disclaimer

Stop Dorcas Lane Turbines Action Group seeks to ensure that the information published on this website is as up to date and accurate as possible. The information on this website does not constitute legal or professional advice and Stop Dorcas Lane Turbines Action Group cannot accept any liability for actions arising from its use. Stop Dorcas Lane Turbines Action Group cannot be held responsible for the contents of any website pages referenced to by an external web link. If you find any errors, please email corrections via the Contact Us page.